IRS and Employers Gear Up for Employment Tax Audits
October 9, 2009 – The Internal Revenue Service has announced plans to launch employment tax audits this fall in conjunction with its National Research Program (NRP). NRP audits are intensive audits followed by analysis. While it is expected that the audits will result in tax assessments, the underlying purpose of the audits is to collect data that will be used in designing profiles for future audits.
A random selection of approximately 6,000 employers will result in the audit class for this project. Employers will be chosen across a broad statistical platform and will include large, medium, and small businesses, for profit, and not-for-profit businesses.
Issues to be considered in these audits include classification of employees v. independent contractors, classification of fringe benefits, reimbursement of expenses, comparison of employee and independent contractor records to actual tax return filings by the recipients, and officer compensation.
Accountable plans for reimbursement of expenses will be examined in the audits. Such plans will be expected to demonstrate that there is a business connection for the expenses, the expenses are reasonable, there is reasonable accounting for the expenses, and reimbursements are paid in a reasonable amount of time.
Auditors will look at withholding and remittance of income taxes, Social Security and Medicare taxes, and unemployment taxes. Employer-prepared payroll tax forms and related deposits will also be examined for accuracy and timeliness.
The audits are expected to begin in November, 2009 and will be conducted over a three year period. Typical audits will cover three years of employment tax records.
Friday, October 16, 2009
Employers: Get Your Ducks In A Row!
Thursday, October 8, 2009
S Corporation Shareholder/Employees and Social Security
Young S corporation shareholders are particularly against paying into the Social Security system because they are of the opinion that by the time they retire, Social Security will be no more. What they do not realize is that the Social Security system is not only for retirement. It also provides disability and survivors benefits. Heaven forbid anything happen to that person, but if it does, Social Security benefits are made available to that person upon disability or to his/her survivors upon death. In the latter scenario, Social Security acts almost like a life insurance policy. Something to think about before you decide to set that low salary as an S corporation shareholder/employee. Not only will you possibly attract the scrutiny of the IRS for an unreasonable salary, you might also be short-changing your family, especially if you aren't sufficiently covered in the private market for disability or life insurance.
For more information about Social Security benefits, you may visit www.ssa.gov
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
QuickBooks 2010 Has Arrived!
Monday, September 21, 2009
Houston Unemployment
Monday, June 29, 2009
Indirect Investors of Madoff Left Out in the Cold
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Employer Question: Temporary Employment = Contract Labor?
Monday, May 4, 2009
IRS CP2000 Notices
IRS Audits Contract Labor
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Pitfalls of the Obama Tax Credit
Friday, March 13, 2009
Question: Can I Do A 1031 Exchange With Foreign Property?
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Quality Control In A Single Preparer Practice
Friday, February 13, 2009
Offer from QuickBooks
Saturday, February 7, 2009
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Pimp My Taxes
Friday, January 30, 2009
Equilibrium
Friday, January 23, 2009
There Is No Such Thing As Contract Labor!
That is what a retired IRS revenue agent told me a few months ago. He now operates a consulting practice assisting those on the “other side” with tax problems. I thought this was interesting and states very clearly the IRS position for the age old question of whether a worker should be classified as an employee or a “1099” vendor or contractor. What he means is that if you hire someone to work for you in your business and the only way to classify your payments to them is as “contract labor” then that person should probably be set up as an employee, having taxes withheld and you as the employer contributing half the social security and medicare. If the person fits more in the category of a consultant or professional service provider, then that implies most likely that person has other customers and his/her own business. The term “contract labor” assumes the person is under your control – you dictate how and when the job gets done. Many employers classify workers as contract labor to save money, but as in the case of paying a nanny as I discussed here, it could be an expensive decision and you could be liable for back taxes. Here is some official IRS guidance on the issue. However, if in doubt it is always best to err on the side of caution, do the right thing, and set that person up as an employee.
Friday, January 16, 2009
An Experiment in Socialism
I am not by any means implying that our country or leaders are “socialist”, free market principles and private ownership of property do still drive this country for the most part, but all the talk during this last election and the bailout fiasco got me thinking about the concept of socialism. My bachelor's degree is in economics and that is really my first love. Because I have had formal training in the subject, I think I approach it with a good background of knowledge. Just remember, what has made this country great and prosperous is not our government policies and programs, but FREEDOM. The freedom to pursue our own happiness as long as it does not encroach the liberty of others. as the Declaration of Independence so well stated. You just can't tax and re-distribute your way into prosperity, I don't care who is getting taxed. Yes, there are people who have a large piece of the pie, but the fact that they do have a large piece means that we all have a chance to obtain a larger piece ourselves. I know that the new administration will keep this in mind because we are still a center-right country in terms of our philosophy.
My clever husband has devised the following classroom socialism experiment. I really think it illustrates the concept of socialism in a way that is simple to understand. It would be cruel and unfair to implement...but that is exactly what socialism is...cruel and unfair. I think it would work! Here is his idea:
If I were a teacher or professor, I would first let the students take the initial exam. Then, I would tell those with the higher than average grades on the exam that it is unfortunate and unfair to those who made below average scores so I am going to take the extra points of the higher scoring students and give them to the lower scoring students so that essentially everyone would have an average score on the exam. Obviously, the students who scored higher on the first exam would no longer have the motivation to work and study for the subsequent exams and would thus score average or worse. The students who scored low to begin with would still not do well because they would be expecting those extra points, and certainly would not gain anything from this system because there would not be extra points to dole out on subsequent exams. Everyone would be worse off!